/ /

  • linkedin
  • Increase Font
  • Sharebar

    States fighting to advance optometry

    This is the first in a series of regular updates about optometric legislation from around the country. Optometry can be a localized profession; however, changes in one state might lay groundwork for similar changes in another. Know what’s happening around the country because it might be coming soon to your area.

    Maine

    Optometrists in Maine are benefitting from new legislation surrounding vision care plans.

    Maine Optometric Association President Tim Kearins, OD, says optometry fought and won a big battle against vision plans from Anthem and Cigna.

    Dr. Kearins says the bill laid out the following details:

    • Vision care plans cannot dictate fees, discounts, or other reimbursement control on goods or services unless they are “covered” services or goods. In this case, “covered” means the plans reimburse the provider directly for the service or good.

    • A health insurer cannot require a provider to be a member of a vision plan as a condition of being allowed onto a medical panel.

    • A vision care plan cannot restrict a provider’s choice of optical labs.

    • A vision care plan, if changing the terms of a contract with a provider, must notify the provider of such changes at least 60 days before the change takes place.

    There has been a rise of startups in the eyecare space—for example, Blink—offering refraction. Optometrists in Maine are proactively addressing the potential problems with these new offerings.

    Related: Best and worst states to practice in 2015

    This bill says that a prescription from a ‘mall kiosk autorefractor,’ online refraction, or cell phone app refraction, is not valid unless it is accompanied by an actual examination of the eye by an optometrist or ophthalmologist,” says Dr. Kearins. “The legislators who heard this bill agreed that a stand-alone refraction by electronic means without an actual exam is extremely misleading to the public, as the public in general would think—as they do now—that a refraction is an eye exam. 

    “The passage of this bill ensures that timely diagnoses will continue to be made on non-symptomatic or mildly symptomatic ocular/systemic diseased patients,” he says.

    State optometrists also faced a bill that stated that expiration dates on spectacle prescriptions were to be ignored and that ODs must fill expired spectacle prescriptions whether ODs believed it ethical or not.

    “This bill was introduced out of the blue by a state representative by request from one of his constituents,” says Dr. Kearins. “We defeated this bill. Actually, we completely crushed this bill.”

    And finally, the Maine Optometric Association worked with the state’s ophthalmologists on a bill that allows glaucoma patients to refill their eye drop prescriptions early as long as they have a refill authorization on file from the doctor. Prior to this bill, if a patient used his eye drop supply for the month and tried to refill before 30 days had elapsed, the pharmacist would tell the patient to come back when 30 days had gone by.

    Next: Alabama takes on vision plans

    Colleen E. McCarthy
    Colleen McCarthy is a freelance writer based in the Cleveland area and a former editor of Optometry Times. She is a 2010 graduate of the ...

    0 Comments

    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Registering is fast and free!

    All comments must follow the ModernMedicine Network community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated. ModernMedicine reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part,in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

    • No comments available

    Optometry Times A/V